As a rough guideline, administrators usually require editors to have made more than 500 useful non-botlike edits, and to have been active in the last thirty days. Patrollers and License reviewers don't have to request this flag. Find possible candidates.
I'd like to see some more edits from you. Under 100 is generally too low, even accounting for your patroller status on Chinese Wikipedia. Abzeronow (talk) 18:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am requesting the autopatrol right, mainly for editing map images. I believe I have a good track record of map image edits and uploads. (One example is the United States abortion laws map, which I have made many helpful edits to in order to reflect changing laws and court rulings in the country.) If given this right, I will use it to continue to make helpful edits mainly to map images as I believe I have done in the past. Thank you. President Loki (talk) 09:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can add audio files already (.flac and .ogg), and given both recent blocks and even more recent copyvios, I don't want to enable mp3 uploads for you since sound recordings are even more complicated copyright-wise. Abzeronow (talk) 16:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to upload audios of sayings. The recordings are of women 70-80 years old. It seems to me a very valuable material. If I make mistakes, I understand being told what I did wrong and being blocked. But if I haven't made mistakes yet, why am I being penalized? Why not explain properly what can and can't be done? Pedagogy is more motivating than punishment. Mentxuwiki (talk) 18:55, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have no intention of punishing you. But as stated, I don't think you can be trusted with the ability to upload mp3s yet. Also as stated, you do have the ability to upload other audio formats. As for recent mistakes, you uploaded photos that contain complex logos and in March 2024, you uploaded press photos that weren't free. Oppose for now. Willing to reevaluate in 3-6 months. Abzeronow (talk) 19:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the two copyvios from March, I don't think you're ready right now to receive this right. [Edit: edit count is still under 500, but better than last application in March] Abzeronow (talk) 16:37, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Abzeronow Sorry, but one of these "copivios" was simply a re-upload of a file that continues to be on this site: [1]. And the second image was taken from an open non-commercial source. And when will I be ready to receive the Autopatrol right? Last time you said 200-300 edits: [2]Dizenter (talk) 05:30, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Commons doesn't accept non-commercial only licenses, COM:L. Yes, I did say that, but edit count is not the only thing I look at.(EDIT: I also said I'd reconsider, not that I'd automatically approve) Abzeronow (talk) 16:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Abzeronow But it accepts a Attribution 4.0 International, according to which similar images can be found on this site in complete peace and no one deletes them. Dizenter (talk) 10:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I have occasionally made minor image corrections and infographic improvements for years and never received any push back, so I would like to request the AutoPatrol permission (now required?) in order to keep making similar contributions within community guidelines. I'm in excellent standing here and at the English Wikipedia. Over 500 local edits (over 37,000 on the 'pedia!) and active in last 30 days. Thank you! — voidxor23:29, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As a rough guideline, administrators usually require editors to have made at least 1,000 useful, non-botlike edits or a large amount of justified renaming requests at Commons before they will consider granting the filemover right.
I've made 1.700 edits here on commons. As I am frequently requesting to move files with meaningless names, it would be great to have the ability to do it myself. I familiarised myself with the filemoving guideline. Thank you. TenWhile611:25, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]